Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 120 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 320 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.1 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Fiat Tipo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Fiat Tipo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1334 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Tipo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`786 | ~ 1`857 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |