Fiat Tipo 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 120 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 320 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.1 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda 3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Fiat Tipo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Fiat Tipo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Fiat Tipo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Tipo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Tipo is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Tipo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1334 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Tipo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`786 kg | ~ 1`857 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`311 kg | ~ 1`296 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 475 kg | ~ 561 kg | |
| Fiat Tipo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Tipo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |