Fiat Stilo 2002 vs Mazda 3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 635 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |