Fiat Stilo 2004 vs Volkswagen Golf 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Audi A2 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`780 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | high | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |