Fiat Stilo 2004 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 1 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Modus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Stilo is 19 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |