Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 56 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.49 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |