Fiat Stilo 2004 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 4 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.49 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |