Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Fiat Stilo engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Kia Ceed. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.49 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 528 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |