Fiat Stilo 2002 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Fiat Stilo engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Despite less power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Stilo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Brava, Fiat Punto | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.64 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |