Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Renault Laguna 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2005 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Laguna 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Stilo is 33 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |