Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Fiat Stilo engine produces 6 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 14 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 5 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Stilo, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |