Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Fiat Stilo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Liana) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 12 HP more power than Suzuki Liana, whereas torque is 111 NM more than Suzuki Liana. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger, but lower. Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1062 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |