Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 37 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Doblo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler PT Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Stilo, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |