Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Toyota Auris 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 29 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Doblo | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |