Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Kia RIO 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Stilo engine produces 28 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Doblo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Stilo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger. Fiat Stilo is 3 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 449 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1277 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 1 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`100 kg | 1`471 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia RIO has
| |