Fiat Stilo 2004 vs Toyota Auris 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Fiat Stilo engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Toyota Auris. Despite less power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | Used also on Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Fiat Stilo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 761 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 270 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |