Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 17 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed 2007 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Stilo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |