Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Chevrolet Kalos 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Fiat Stilo engine produces 22 HP more power than Chevrolet Kalos, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Chevrolet Kalos. Despite the higher power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Stilo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Kalos, which means that by driving the Fiat Stilo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Stilo is 37 cm longer than the Chevrolet Kalos, 9 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Kalos, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Fiat Stilo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Stilo, so Fiat Stilo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Chevrolet Kalos has
| |