Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Stilo engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Fiat Stilo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Stilo could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Stilo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia Ceed 2007 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Stilo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |