Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Renault Megane 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 170 HP | 80 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 305 NM | 127 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | 6.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.7 | 4.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Stilo is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Stilo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`218 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |