Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 170 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 305 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.7 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 878 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`218 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |