Fiat Stilo 2003 vs Kia Ceed 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Kia Ceed has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 150 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 128 - 320 NM | 137 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | 10.5 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 8.3 | 3.9 - 6.8 | |
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.49 m | |
Fiat Stilo is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 528 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Fiat Stilo has 18 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Fiat Stilo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`225 | ~ 1`859 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |