Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 170 HP | 68 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 305 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 13.8 seconds | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.8 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger. Fiat Stilo is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`088 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |