Fiat Stilo 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 170 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 305 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 13.8 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.8 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Fiat Stilo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.64 m | |
| Fiat Stilo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Fiat Stilo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |