Fiat Stilo 2006 vs Chevrolet Kalos 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Kalos has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 120 HP | 71 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 280 NM | 104 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 12.4 seconds | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.0 | 6.6 - 7.6 | |
|
Fiat Stilo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Kalos. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Fiat Stilo is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Stilo is 37 cm longer than the Chevrolet Kalos, 9 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Stilo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 175 litres | |
|
Fiat Stilo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Stilo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Kalos. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Stilo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Kalos, which means Fiat Stilo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`133 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Stilo has
|
Chevrolet Kalos has
| |