Fiat Scudo 2012 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Fiat Scudo engine produces 42 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
1020 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.98 m | 1.74 m | |
Fiat Scudo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Scudo is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Scudo is 24 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 5000 litres | 809 litres | |
Fiat Scudo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Scudo has 4191 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Scudo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`370 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests, butFiat Scudo is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 11 200 | 13 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Scudo has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |