Fiat Punto 1999 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 114 NM | 99 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Fiat Punto is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Punto engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Fiat Punto reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Punto consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Punto could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Punto consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.80 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
Fiat Punto is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 264 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 700 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Fiat Punto has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Fiat Punto quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |