Fiat Punto 1999 vs Dacia Logan 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Punto engine produces 15 HP less power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Dacia Logan. Due to the lower power, Fiat Punto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Punto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Punto consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Fiat Punto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Punto consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Punto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Panda | Used also on Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Fiat Punto is smaller. Fiat Punto is 41 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Punto is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 297 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 510 litres | |
| Fiat Punto has 213 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`385 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Punto has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |