Fiat Punto 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Fiat Punto
2003 - 2010
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 80 HP75 HP
Torque: 114 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds13.6 seconds
Fiat Punto is more dynamic to drive.
Fiat Punto engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 81 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Fiat Punto reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.04.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Fiat Punto consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Punto could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Punto consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway1120 km on highway
690 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.86 m3.90 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Punto is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 297 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1080 litres975 litres
Fiat Punto has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Punto has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 105 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4451`550
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Punto, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001200
Pros and Cons: Fiat Punto has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv