Fiat Punto 2012 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Punto engine produces 67 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Fiat Punto reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Punto is smaller, but higher. Fiat Punto is 30 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Punto is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Fiat Punto has 49 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 470 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Punto has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |