Fiat Punto 1999 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat Punto
1999 - 2003
Volvo V40
2016 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 130 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 102 - 196 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 - 15 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 8.33.4 - 5.9
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.80 m4.37 m
Width: 1.66 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Fiat Punto is smaller, but higher.
Fiat Punto is 57 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Punto is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 264 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1080 litres1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Fiat Punto has 71 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 420 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`487~ 1`978
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 140011 600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Punto has
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv