Fiat Punto 1999 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 130 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 - 196 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.3 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Punto is larger. Fiat Punto is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 264 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Fiat Punto has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`487 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Renault Clio has
| |