Fiat Punto 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat Punto
1999 - 2003
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.0 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 60 - 80 HP45 - 100 HP
Torque: 102 - 196 NM76 - 135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 - 15 seconds10.5 - 21.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 6.54.7 - 8.6
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.84 m3.72 m
Width: 1.66 m1.66 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Fiat Punto is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Punto is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 297 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1080 litres975 litres
Fiat Punto has more luggage capacity.
Fiat Punto has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 105 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`477~ 1`401
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Fiat Punto has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv