Fiat Punto 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 102 - 260 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.86 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Punto is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 297 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 1030 litres | |
Fiat Punto has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Punto has 27 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`530 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |