Fiat Punto 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Fiat Punto
2003 - 2010
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.2 - 1.9


Power: 60 - 100 HP55 - 100 HP
Torque: 102 - 260 NM106 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 14.3 seconds10.7 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 6.54.5 - 7.4
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 3.86 m3.90 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Punto is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 297 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1080 litres1030 litres
Fiat Punto has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Punto has 27 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 50 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`500~ 1`530
Safety: no data

Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Punto has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: