Fiat Punto 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 - 260 NM | 93 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Fiat Punto petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Fiat Punto equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Punto is larger. Fiat Punto is 5 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Punto is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 297 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 1037 litres | |
|
Fiat Punto has more luggage capacity. Fiat Punto has 42 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Punto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Punto has
|
Renault Clio has
| |