Fiat Panda 1994 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 39 HP | 85 HP | |
Torque: | 65 NM | 103 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 46 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.41 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.49 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 97 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1377 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.3 metres less than that of the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`520 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |