Fiat Panda 1994 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 39 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 65 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 21 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |