Fiat Panda 1994 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 39 HP | 50 HP | |
Torque: | 65 NM | 74 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
Fiat Panda engine produces 11 HP less power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Peugeot 106. Despite less power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
640 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.41 m | 3.68 m | |
Width: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 953 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`215 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |