Fiat Panda 1991 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Nissan Almera. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 77 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |