Fiat Panda 1991 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 18 HP less power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Chevrolet Spark is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Panda consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Spark gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 170 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |