Fiat Panda 1994 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 83 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |