Fiat Panda 1989 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 44 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Nissan Almera. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 77 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |