Fiat Panda 1989 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 44 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 24 HP less power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 170 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |