Fiat Panda 1989 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 45 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 73 NM | 93 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 23 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 3.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
580 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.41 m | 3.41 m | |
Width: | 1.49 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Fiat Panda and Toyota Aygo are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 139 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`160 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |