Fiat Panda 1989 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 73 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |