Fiat Panda 1989 vs Ford Fusion 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 73 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Ford Fusion. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 61 cm shorter than the Ford Fusion, 23 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1175 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |