Fiat Panda 1986 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995

 
Fiat Panda
1986 - 1989
Suzuki Baleno
1995 - 2000
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 44 HP85 HP
Torque: 76 NM103 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds12.5 seconds
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Panda engine produces 41 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
610 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.41 m4.38 m
Width: 1.50 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Fiat Panda is smaller.
Fiat Panda is 97 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1377 litres
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.3 metres less than that of the Suzuki Baleno.
Gross weight (kg): 7501`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Fiat Panda has
  • lower fuel consumption
Suzuki Baleno has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv