Fiat Panda 1986 vs Rover 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 44 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 100 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 16 HP less power than Rover 100, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Rover 100. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
|
The Rover 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Panda consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Panda gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 100, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 229 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 552 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 100. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Rover 100 has
| |