Fiat Panda 1986 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 44 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 74 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Peugeot 106, but torque is 2 NM more than Peugeot 106. Despite less power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 953 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |