Fiat Panda 2002 vs Rover 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 100 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Rover 100, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Rover 100. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Rover 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Panda consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Rover 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 100, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 229 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 552 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 100, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Rover 100 has
| |