Fiat Panda 2001 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Panda engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Panda engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Fiat Panda and Toyota Aygo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |